Hi everyone,
Please make sure your systems are cofigured correctly when it comes
to Micronet. I am having all sorts of weird mail come in which I'm
just deleting.
Thanks,
Sean
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Classic BBS (618:250/1)
* Origin: Classic BBS (618:250/1)
I can't believe this is even possible with Mystic. Someone was able to send a Micronet message to FSXnet with the original MSGID and origin line?
HPT should have caught that as an invalid message. How it got past two HPT tossers is kinda mind boggling.
I can't believe this is even possible with Mystic. Someone was able to send Micronet message to FSXnet with the original MSGID and origin line?
HPT should have caught that as an invalid message. How it got past two HPT tossers is kinda mind boggling.
Actually, I've noticed HPT does it a lot, so I dont think it
validates that?
I normally hear about it because clrghouz does reject invalid zones
(for a domain), and netmails the sender (often another hub) of the
invalid message.
The bad part is other nodes on other hubs get the message anyway and
reply to it - then I get a bunch of "I didnt get that message"
messages to me from my nodes... :(
HPT should have caught that as an invalid message. How it got past two HPT
tossers is kinda mind boggling.
Another key to my point how FTN is screwed in mystic.
Please make sure your systems are cofigured correctly when it comes
to Micronet. I am having all sorts of weird mail come in which I'm
just deleting.
Thanks,
Sean
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Classic BBS (618:250/1)
I can't believe this is even possible with Mystic. Someone was able to send a Micronet message to FSXnet with the original MSGID and origin line?
HPT should have caught that as an invalid message. How it got past two HPT tossers is kinda mind boggling.
My recollection on Mystic is rusty at best, but I didn't even know
you could crosslink echoes... like point them to the same msg base...
in the config program. This message was originally posted by Sean
from his own BBS in MIN_ADMIN. Classic BBS must have echoed it back
out into this echo somehow. I don't think Sean is even on FSXnet.
What is even better is that they used *my* Micronet node number to do it, too. ;) Looks like I need to have a talk with someone.
My recollection on Mystic is rusty at best, but I didn't even know you
could crosslink echoes... like point them to the same msg base... in the config program. This message was originally posted by Sean from his own BBS in MIN_ADMIN. Classic BBS must have echoed it back out into this echo somehow. I don't think Sean is even on FSXnet.
It might also be a bad packet?
I see fairly regularly from mystic systems - but I cant pinpoint why its occuring, but packets are corrupted because a subsequent messsage in the packe
partially overwrites the previous message.
How I notice it, is I see or the SEEN-BY lines dumped as plain text in the message, often with the message truncated, and the "from" AKA shown as being the hub that sent the packet (at least for me in sync).
My apologies that my BBS did this. I have been working with Mike from Micronet and after reserching the logs and verifying my configuration several times we are still not sure how this happened.
origin line address, or posted to the wrong echo/network).^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks deon. What was so strange about it is I verfied my
configuration and nothing had changed in it for several months of
moving messages in and out. If I had something misconfigured I would definately own up to it( I lost my ego many years ago). It was just
really strange and we were unable to track anything specific down. Hopefully if it happens again in the future at least I have the
logging turned up to debug so I can hopefully see what happened. :-)
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 92 |
Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
Uptime: | 01:03:15 |
Calls: | 6,593 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 8,482 |
D/L today: |
645 files (339M bytes) |
Messages: | 359,752 |