But I have no idea how to drive it. What *is* an SPI? Ah! Serial
peripheral interface, so it wont be fast. e-ink is alway pretty sluggish >though anyway.
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:08:27 +0100
Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
No, sadly those E-Ink displays are too slow. I don't need really fast refresh but I do need to be able to refresh in, say, 100mS (or maybe a bit more).
Do you need to refresh the whole screen? Many of the e-ink displays are
able to do a partial refresh in much shorter time.
How about this ?
https://www.adafruit.com/product/1303
The Pixel Qi company went bankrupt in 2015, and while supposedly this one
has the rights to manufacture and claims to do so: https://www.tripuso.com/index.html
it's not clear if they still do.
However it is possible to buy the 7" panels on Aliexpress: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005001944445301.html https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4001025242130.html
datasheet https://www.openvario.org/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=projects:series_00:spec_sheet_pq070ws01_dcn20130103-100.pdf
and it looks like the decoder board used by Adafruit is available: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003128606387.html
(although the Adafruit 10.1" panel has a different pinout from the Aliexpress 7" one, so a cable would need to be made)
The Adafruit 10.1" panel is also available, for a higher price: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32717016812.html
Looking at the datasheet it looks pretty plug and play - you switch from transmissive through transflective to reflective mode by just dimming the backlight down to zero. When the ambient light is strong the reflective pixels wash out the transmissive ones, resulting in semi-greyscale.
The 7" is about 2W in 100% backlight and 0.5W in 0% backlight, so not as low power as e-ink, but acceptable if you don't need such low power consumption.
Almost tempted to get one to play with, if only I had an application...
No, I don't need to refresh it all. The only relatively fast refresh
is for the rudder position indicator which would just be a single dark
cursor (or similar) moving about.
Power isn't an issue for me, it's on a canal/river boat with
(relatively) lots of 12 volt power available.
Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:No, I don't need to refresh it all. The only relatively fast refresh
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:08:27 +0100
Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
No, sadly those E-Ink displays are too slow. I don't need really fast >> > > refresh but I do need to be able to refresh in, say, 100mS (or maybe a >> > > bit more).
Do you need to refresh the whole screen? Many of the e-ink displays are
able to do a partial refresh in much shorter time.
is for the rudder position indicator which would just be a single dark
cursor (or similar) moving about.
Am I missing something if I propose an old analog meter where the hand shows the rudder position?
Or a needle connected to a stepper motor?
I was into that stuff some years back, used a Pocket book Aqua2 (e-ink display) to connect to
my software server.
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/xgpspc/index.html
Not that much impressed with e-ink...
There exist very good sunlight readable monitors I have heard.
Do not have a boat at this time...
On a sunny day (Sat, 29 Jul 2023 19:27:46 +0100) it happened Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote in <2a2gpj-7p752.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu>:
Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:No, I don't need to refresh it all. The only relatively fast refresh
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:08:27 +0100
Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
No, sadly those E-Ink displays are too slow. I don't need really fast >> > > refresh but I do need to be able to refresh in, say, 100mS (or maybe a >> > > bit more).
Do you need to refresh the whole screen? Many of the e-ink displays are >> able to do a partial refresh in much shorter time.
is for the rudder position indicator which would just be a single dark >cursor (or similar) moving about.
Am I missing something if I propose an old analog meter where the hand shows the rudder position?
Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 29 Jul 2023 19:27:46 +0100) it happened Chris GreenNo, it's an approach that I'm seriously considering. As the
<cl@isbd.net> wrote in <2a2gpj-7p752.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu>:
Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:No, I don't need to refresh it all. The only relatively fast refresh
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:08:27 +0100
Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
No, sadly those E-Ink displays are too slow. I don't need really fast >>>>>> refresh but I do need to be able to refresh in, say, 100mS (or maybe a >>>>>> bit more).
Do you need to refresh the whole screen? Many of the e-ink displays are >>>> able to do a partial refresh in much shorter time.
is for the rudder position indicator which would just be a single dark
cursor (or similar) moving about.
Am I missing something if I propose an old analog meter where the hand shows the rudder position?
'transducer' at the rudder end is simply a pot stuck on top of the
rudder post the whole thing can be analogue. I'm actually thinking
that an edgewise meter might be best.
On 30/07/2023 10:55, Chris Green wrote:
Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 29 Jul 2023 19:27:46 +0100) it happened Chris Green >>> <cl@isbd.net> wrote in <2a2gpj-7p752.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu>:No, it's an approach that I'm seriously considering. As the
Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:No, I don't need to refresh it all. The only relatively fast refresh
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:08:27 +0100
Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
No, sadly those E-Ink displays are too slow. I don't need really fast >>>>>>> refresh but I do need to be able to refresh in, say, 100mS (or maybe a >>>>>>> bit more).
Do you need to refresh the whole screen? Many of the e-ink displays are >>>>> able to do a partial refresh in much shorter time.
is for the rudder position indicator which would just be a single dark >>>> cursor (or similar) moving about.
Am I missing something if I propose an old analog meter where the hand shows the rudder position?
'transducer' at the rudder end is simply a pot stuck on top of the
rudder post the whole thing can be analogue. I'm actually thinking
that an edgewise meter might be best.
If you decide to use e.g. a radio control servo, there are very
inexpensive 'servo testers' which do in fact have a pot in the middle.
The whole lot could be had for just a few dollars. You could wire your
pot up to them. Or generate your own PWM with a pi - the servo spec is a
20 Hz (or thereabouts) repetition of a 1-2ms pulse, with 1.5ms being the >putative 'straight ahead' position.
And every time the servos dies its trivial money these days to plug in a
new one
Analogue meters don't come cheap or with suitable scales these days. And
thay are soewahtt fragile.
But I have no idea how to drive it. What *is* an SPI? Ah! Serial
peripheral interface, so it wont be fast. e-ink is alway pretty sluggish though anyway.
If you decide to use e.g. a radio control servo, there are very
inexpensive 'servo testers' which do in fact have a pot in the middle.
The whole lot could be had for just a few dollars. You could wire your
pot up to them. Or generate your own PWM with a pi - the servo spec is a
20 Hz (or thereabouts) repetition of a 1-2ms pulse, with 1.5ms being the >>putative 'straight ahead' position.
Analogue meters don't come cheap or with suitable scales these days.
And thay are soewahtt fragile.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 124 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 07:37:11 |
| Calls: | 7,885 |
| Files: | 9,397 |
| D/L today: |
20 files (1,652K bytes) |
| Messages: | 399,546 |