Should HPT be adding the "TID: " header when 'disabletid = no' ?
Should HPT be adding the "TID: " header when 'disabletid = no' ?
"Don't disable". Hmm.. :D
Anyways, it is adding TID if you comment that line out.
@MSGID: 1:154/10.0 656cde5e
@REPLY: 2:221/6.0 656cd012
@PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux 2.0 b20231114
@CHRS: UTF-8 4
@TZUTC: -0600
@TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
So my messages do have a TID on them, and I just don't see it because HPT adds
it upon scan/export?
@MSGID: 1:154/10.0 656cde5e
@REPLY: 2:221/6.0 656cd012
@PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux 2.0 b20231114
@CHRS: UTF-8 4
@TZUTC: -0600
@TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24
So my messages do have a TID on them, and I just don't see itbecause HPT adds
it upon scan/export?
Yep!
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20231112
So my messages do have a TID on them, and I just don't see it
because HPT adds
it upon scan/export?
The quote wrap above seems way off.
Yep!
Thank you for confirming. I retract my original question. ;)
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20231112
Now why in the world would Golded have an issue wrapping that quote?
That's not for this echo though.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 96 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 01:04:18 |
| Calls: | 6,997 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 8,556 |
| U/L today: |
2 files (2,394K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
2,814 files (1,229M bytes) |
| Messages: | 368,980 |