Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Vague <=-
Hello Vague,
1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled out from under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fido node,
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hub is
being exploited?
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hub is
being exploited?
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Dan Clough <=-
1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled out from under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fido node,
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hub is
being exploited?
There are no Via lines in echomail, but his path lines start
with: @PATH: 135/391. That is:
,391,Vague_BBS,Largo_FL,David_Duff,-Unpublished-,300,CM,INA:vague. ddns.net,IBN,ITN
So my guess would be: mister Vague is David Duff...
Björn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=-
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hub is
being exploited?
As Wilfred already has explained, there is no Via lines in
echomail, but we do have Path lines. And the Path line to my
system may be like Wilfred's:
X-JAM-PATH2D: 135/391 300 3634/12 640/1384 221/1 203/0 2
So my guess would be: mister Vague is David Duff...
I just hope that Largo_FL has nothing to do with Mar-a-Lago.
Nice. So I wonder why he's posting from an apparent address of 1:3603/9999 ?
Misconfiguration, or attempted misdirection?
So my guess would be: mister Vague is David Duff...
sounds like he just needs to go back over his configuration and fix the FTN
addresses in his fidonet areas, then... a simple thing to fix, really... certainly nothing worth flamage and heavy bombardment...
mark lewis wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Nice. So I wonder why he's posting from an apparent address of 1:3603/9999 ?
Misconfiguration, or attempted misdirection?
net3603 used to cover the tampa area... the entire state of
florida is now covered by one net, net135...
IIRC, david is a returning operator and he appears to have set up
using the old net and temporary node number used for applying for
a node... i would guess that he configured his system using the
temp number and just hasn't gone back to change everything to use
his actual assigned address... a simple oversight... probably
encumbered by using a configuration script or similar tool when configuring fidonet for his system...
Hi Dan,
On 2021-02-13 07:38:00, you wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:
1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled out fr under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fido node, can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hub is being exploited?
out fr1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled
under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fidonode,
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hubis
being exploited?
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was very deliberate.
There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
Exploitation was his goal at every angle, his handle - Vauge.
I also went to the nodelist, I found nothing.
Could it be that these massages were gated to the newsgroups and then
back into Fidonet.
Policy 4 rules Fidonet, but is there a provision within policy to
account for what Mr. Duff was able to pull off
and additionally would he or could he be held accountable for a explanation of his previous antics?
Now that Mr. Duff has a fully fledged node in Fidonet wouldn't it seem logical and appropriate to reach out to his NC to see if they could shed any light as to what happened?
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
Exploitation was his goal at every angle, his handle - Vauge.
Now that Mr. Duff has a fully fledged node in Fidonet wouldn't it seem logical and appropriate to reach out to his NC to see if they could shed any light as to what happened?
Host,135,Sunshine_State_Net,Gainesville_FL,Eric_Renfro
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of
a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this
was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action
& behavior.
On 2021-02-27 10:26:55, you wrote to me:
out fr1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled
under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fidonode,
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what huis
being exploited?
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was ve deliberate.
I believe it was an honest mistake. He asked for help with his configuration (don't remember which area), and has since fixed it.
He still uses the alias. But that is ultimately up to the moderator, although it is a decenia old tradition (but not a ruel) in fidonet to
use your real-name...
There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
If you really feel that way, you should talk to the area moderator(s),
or file a formal complaint with your *C, if you think it's not an
echomail specific offence...
Than you didn't look to close, it was very obvious from the path line and origin in his messages, who he was.
On 27 Feb 21 10:26:55, Gregory Deyss said the following to Wilfred Van Velzen:
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was ver deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
I think he fixed whatever the problem was.
Re: Re: Who are you?
By: Gregory Deyss to Wilfred van Velzen on Sat Feb 27 2021 10:26:55
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of
a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this
was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action
& behavior.
i can tell you, without a doubt, that the erroneous FTN address in the origin line was a misconfiguration... he had set up originally with it (via a configuration script) to rejoin fidonet he was hoping to rejoin
the same net he had been in previously but that is not possible
anymore... he was not aware that the address had been written to each of his fidonet message areas' settings... it was not "deliberate" as in he was not trying to cause problems... once it was pointed out and he was able to investigate his fidonet areas' settings, he was quite able to
fix the problem with the erroneous address in the origin line...
I think he fixed whatever the problem was.
Then the matter is closed, to spite how annoying he has been in the past.
whether or not real names are required in this echo remains to be seen... the moderator has not spoken about it nor have they posted any rules for this area in years...
I forget who it was that compared the telephone network to
the internet by saying that the telephone network was a
smart network with dumb endpoints, and the internet was a
dumb network with smart endpoints. It seemed like a sound
analogy.
Kurt Weiske wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Lee Lofaso wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
Every sysop is lord and master of his/her own system.
As well as his/her own universe.
I forget who it was that compared the telephone network to the internet
by saying that the telephone network was a smart network with dumb endpoints, and the internet was a dumb network with smart endpoints. It seemed like a sound analogy.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 93 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 08:27:58 |
Calls: | 3,591 |
Calls today: | 10 |
Files: | 8,469 |
Messages: | 338,334 |
Posted today: | 24 |