Are they even still doing the FidoGazette? I thought they
had stopped with that.
Maybe I'm thinking of something else.
Most likely there is not even enough material for another
newsletter to re-establish the FidoGazette. Most echos are
devoid of interesting chatter. What kind of newsletter would
reflect that? - an empty one perhaps. :(
I *do* miss the top echo list that showed the weekly message
counts.
I *do* miss the top echo list that showed the weekly message
counts.
I *do* miss the top echo list that showed the weekly
message counts.
Just connect to the STATS echo, there are multiple echo
mail lists showing counts every day. ;-)
I *do* miss the top echo list that showed the weekly
message counts.
Just connect to the STATS echo, there are multiple echo
mail lists showing counts every day. ;-)
I have. But..
Janis' was the best design.
Maybe it's a matter of getting used to?
Or else you will have to create your own. ;-)
Or else you will have to create your own. ;-)
As a "user" I cannot. But I seem to remember that the ones in
STATS are quite limited and often just list the top-10 active
ones only. Janis' at least covered most of the ELIST ones.
I have. But..
Janis' was the best design.
I have. But..
Janis' was the best design.
I will never understand "stats"... those that collect them, those that read them, the idea that one can judge whats a good echo or not based on an arbitrary number of posts. Especially busy-idiots who post them routinely as part of some stupid script out of a need to feel important.
Some echoes have lots of messages but are completely devoid of any interesting content while others have only a few posts but can be very interesting.
Nick is the greatest ->whatever-comes-to-mind<-, everybody else's motivation sucks.
Some echoes have lots of messages but are completely devoid of anynteresting
content while others have only a few posts but can be very interesting.
I will never understand "stats"... those that collect
them, those that read them, the idea that one can judge
whats a good echo or not based on an arbitrary number of
posts. Especially busy-idiots who post them routinely as
part of some stupid script out of a need to feel
important.
Some echoes have lots of messages but are completely devoid of any interesting content while others have only a few posts but can be very interesting.
[...] And nothing much has changed in the last
couple of years, so I think you remember it wrong...
So I think all the information you want is there, but
maybe not in the form you were used to by Janis. And
Janis's was a big system, with most areas (which probably
were mostly empty for a big part of them)...
Granted, the stats of some of the echos are highly skewed with
the repetative auto-posts with rules and stuff. However, it is
good to have something to indicate that some life in them
exists and that someone has an eye on them.
I *do* miss the top echo list that showed the weekly message
counts.
128 STATS
127 COOKING
128 STATS
127 COOKING
Meaning 2/3 of what passes your system
are statistics and cooking-recipes from a database which over the
years have been posted at least 5 times.
are statistics and cooking-recipes from a database which over the
years have been posted at least 5 times.
There is some chatter in COOKING, not only recipes...
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 92 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 00:06:07 |
Calls: | 6,587 |
Files: | 8,482 |
D/L today: |
80 files (56,560K bytes) |
Messages: | 359,571 |